SlicerOrbitSurgerySim: An Open-Source Platform for Virtual Registration and Quantitative Comparison of Preformed Orbital Plates

Summary

This paper introduces SlicerOrbitSurgerySim, an open-source 3D Slicer extension designed to quantitatively compare the fit of preformed orbital plates in a patient-specific virtual planning environment. The platform addresses a critical gap by providing tools for interactive virtual registration, objective evaluation through reproducible plate-to-orbit distance metrics, and visualization to improve preoperative decision-making and reduce intraoperative modifications.

Medical Relevance

Poor adaptation of orbital implants significantly contributes to surgical complications and revision rates. This tool offers a standardized, quantitative method to optimize preformed plate selection and placement, directly aiming to improve patient outcomes, reduce surgical time, and enhance safety in orbital reconstruction.

AI Health Application

This paper presents a medical application of computational tools for surgical planning and simulation. SlicerOrbitSurgerySim enables patient-specific virtual registration, evaluation, and comparison of preformed orbital plates, directly supporting preoperative decision-making and potentially reducing surgical complications. While the abstract does not explicitly state the use of advanced AI algorithms (like machine learning) for registration or comparison, it falls under the umbrella of 'medical applications' by providing a quantitative, computational platform for optimizing surgical outcomes and implant selection.

Key Points

  • Poor adaptation of orbital implants is a significant contributor to postoperative complications and revision surgeries, exacerbated by a lack of quantitative comparison tools for preformed plates.
  • SlicerOrbitSurgerySim is an open-source extension for the 3D Slicer platform, enabling interactive virtual registration, evaluation, and comparison of multiple preformed orbital plates.
  • The software provides patient-specific virtual planning capabilities, generating reproducible quantitative plate-to-orbit distance metrics and visualization tools.
  • It supports both individual patient planning for optimal plate selection and placement, and population-level statistical analysis to understand overall plate adaptability.
  • The platform aims to facilitate objective comparison of implant designs and placement strategies across vendors, sizes, and patient anatomies.
  • Expected outcomes include improved preoperative decision-making, reduction in intraoperative plate modification, and promotion of collaborative research and surgical education.
  • Pilot studies, sample datasets, and detailed tutorials are provided to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and ease of adoption for testing and research.

Methodology

The methodology involves the development of an open-source software extension, SlicerOrbitSurgerySim, for the existing 3D Slicer platform. This extension integrates features for interactive virtual registration of preformed orbital plates to patient-specific CT or MRI data, calculates and visualizes quantitative plate-to-orbit distance metrics, and provides tools for comparison across different plate designs and sizes within a virtual planning environment.

Key Findings

The primary finding is the successful development and demonstration of SlicerOrbitSurgerySim as a functional open-source platform. This platform effectively enables interactive virtual registration and quantitative comparison of preformed orbital plates, generating reproducible plate-to-orbit distance metrics and visualization tools. It fulfills the critical need for an objective method to evaluate implant fit for both patient-specific surgical planning and population-level design analysis.

Clinical Impact

SlicerOrbitSurgerySim has the potential to significantly impact clinical practice by enhancing preoperative planning, leading to more precise implant selection and reduced need for intraoperative plate bending or modification. This can decrease operative time, lower costs, minimize surgical complications, and ultimately improve functional and aesthetic outcomes for patients undergoing orbital reconstruction. It also provides a robust tool for surgical training and research into implant design.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state limitations of the developed SlicerOrbitSurgerySim platform itself. It highlights the current lack of publicly available tools as a problem that the platform aims to address.

Future Directions

The paper implies future directions toward promoting collaborative research and surgical education through the widespread adoption and utilization of SlicerOrbitSurgerySim. This suggests further validation through larger studies, integration into clinical workflows, and potentially expansion to other reconstructive areas, fostering a community around objective implant evaluation and surgical planning.

Medical Domains

Orbital Surgery Craniofacial Surgery Oculoplastic Surgery Reconstructive Surgery Surgical Oncology

Keywords

orbital implants preformed plates virtual surgery 3D Slicer surgical planning quantitative analysis patient-specific open-source

Abstract

Poor adaptation of orbital implants remains a major contributor to postoperative complications and revision surgery. Although preformed orbital plates are widely used to reduce cost and operative time compared with customized implants, surgeons currently lack publicly available tools and standardized metrics to quantitatively compare plate fit across vendors, sizes, and patient anatomy. We developed SlicerOrbitSurgerySim, an open-source extension for the 3D Slicer platform that enables interactive virtual registration, evaluation, and comparison of multiple preformed orbital plates in a patient-specific virtual planning environment. The software generates reproducible quantitative plate-to-orbit distance metrics and visualization tools that support both patient-specific planning and population-level statistical analysis of plate adaptability. By facilitating objective comparison of implant designs and placement strategies, this tool aims to improve preoperative decision-making, reduce intraoperative plate modification, and promote collaborative research and surgical education. Pilot studies, sample datasets, and detailed tutorials are provided to support testing, transparency, and reproducibility.

Comments

12 pages, 8 figures. Submitted to Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Code: https://github.com/chz31/SlicerOrbitSurgerySim/tree/main