Prediction Intervals for Individual Treatment Effects in a Multiple Decision Point Framework using Conformal Inference

Summary

This paper introduces a novel method for constructing prediction intervals for Individual Treatment Effects (ITEs) that vary over time and across multiple decision points. Utilizing conformal inference techniques, the proposed approach offers guaranteed lower bound coverage, notably with weaker assumptions compared to existing literature. The methodology is primarily supported by simulations mimicking micro-randomized trials (MRTs) in mobile health (mHealth) and demonstrated on the real-world Intern Health Study (IHS) MRT.

Medical Relevance

Accurate uncertainty quantification of ITEs is paramount for personalized medicine, enabling clinicians to make data-driven, tailored decisions for patients over time. This method is particularly vital for the design and analysis of adaptive interventions in mHealth, where treatment decisions are made repeatedly.

AI Health Application

The paper develops a method using conformal inference (a statistical machine learning technique) to construct prediction intervals for individual treatment effects (ITEs). This application supports data-driven personalized decision-making in healthcare, particularly for time-varying interventions in mobile health studies. By providing uncertainty quantification for ITEs, it enhances the reliability and interpretability of AI/ML models used for personalized treatment recommendations and interventions in health.

Key Points

• Addresses the critical need for accurately quantifying uncertainty of time-varying Individual Treatment Effects (ITEs) in personalized decision-making across sequential contexts.
• Proposes a novel method leveraging conformal inference to construct prediction intervals for ITEs, overcoming limitations of prior work that relied on non-causal estimands, cross-sectional data, or strong exchangeability assumptions.
• Guarantees a lower bound for the coverage of the constructed prediction intervals, with this bound's tightness being dependent on the degree of non-exchangeability present in the data.
• The theoretical claims are rigorously supported through simulations specifically designed to emulate micro-randomized trials (MRTs), a common sequential experimental design in mHealth research.
• Demonstrates practical utility and real-world applicability by applying the method to data from the Intern Health Study (IHS), a notable micro-randomized trial.
• The method is broadly applicable across various decision-making fields, including healthcare, finance, education, and online marketplaces, emphasizing its generalizability.

Clinical Impact

This method can significantly enhance the reliability of personalized healthcare decisions by providing more accurate and robust uncertainty estimates for individual treatment effects. It is particularly impactful for mHealth studies and adaptive interventions, allowing for more precise tailoring of interventions to patients in real-time. Clinicians could use these prediction intervals to better understand the potential range of outcomes for an individual patient under different treatment strategies, improving shared decision-making and optimizing intervention delivery.

Limitations

The abstract indicates that the guaranteed coverage is a 'lower bound' and its effectiveness is 'dependent on the degree of non-exchangeability in the data'. This suggests that while a minimum coverage is assured, the actual coverage might vary and could be less precise in highly non-exchangeable data settings, potentially requiring careful interpretation of the interval width.

Future Directions

While not explicitly stated as 'future directions,' the abstract highlights the broad applicability of the method across various decision-making contexts (healthcare, finance, education, online marketplaces). This implies future work could involve extending its application to more diverse real-world datasets and contexts beyond mHealth, further exploring its performance under varying degrees of non-exchangeability, and potentially refining the bounds or developing methods to mitigate the impact of high non-exchangeability.

Medical Domains

Keywords

Abstract

Accurately quantifying uncertainty of individual treatment effects (ITEs) across multiple decision points is crucial for personalized decision-making in fields such as healthcare, finance, education, and online marketplaces. Previous work has focused on predicting non-causal longitudinal estimands or constructing prediction bands for ITEs using cross-sectional data based on exchangeability assumptions. We propose a novel method for constructing prediction intervals using conformal inference techniques for time-varying ITEs with weaker assumptions than prior literature. We guarantee a lower bound for coverage, which is dependent on the degree of non-exchangeability in the data. Although our method is broadly applicable across decision-making contexts, we support our theoretical claims with simulations emulating micro-randomized trials (MRTs) -- a sequential experimental design for mobile health (mHealth) studies. We demonstrate the practical utility of our method by applying it to a real-world MRT - the Intern Health Study (IHS).