Large Causal Models from Large Language Models

Summary

This paper introduces a novel paradigm and system, DEMOCRITUS, for building Large Causal Models (LCMs) by leveraging the vast knowledge embedded in Large Language Models (LLMs). DEMOCRITUS departs from traditional hypothesis-driven causal inference by extracting and integrating fragmented causal claims from diverse textual sources into coherent relational causal triples using new categorical machine learning methods, applicable across multiple domains including medicine.

Medical Relevance

By enabling the automated construction of comprehensive causal models for medical domains, this work could provide a deeper, interconnected understanding of disease etiology, drug mechanisms, and treatment outcomes, integrating knowledge from vast and disparate textual sources to identify complex relationships often missed by siloed research.

AI Health Application

The DEMOCRITUS system leverages LLMs to generate causal questions and extract plausible causal statements from diverse textual sources related to medicine. It then integrates these into coherent large causal models (LCMs). This application can significantly advance medical understanding by synthesizing complex causal relationships in areas such as disease progression, treatment outcomes, public health interventions, and drug interactions, aiding in hypothesis generation and decision support in healthcare and medical research.

Key Points

  • Introduces DEMOCRITUS, a system designed to construct LCMs by querying LLMs and organizing their output into structured causal models.
  • Methodologically distinct from traditional causal inference, which relies on numerical data from experiments; DEMOCRITUS instead extracts plausible causal statements from diverse textual queries.
  • Utilizes LLMs to propose topics, generate causal questions, and extract initial causal statements, emphasizing a knowledge extraction approach.
  • Addresses the technical challenge of integrating isolated, fragmented, ambiguous, and potentially conflicting causal claims into a coherent, relational causal model.
  • Employs novel categorical machine learning methods to convert extracted claims into relational causal triples and embed them into an LCM.
  • The DEMOCRITUS pipeline consists of six modules, with the paper highlighting its computational cost profile and identifying scaling bottlenecks.
  • Demonstrates applicability across a wide range of domains including archaeology, biology, climate change, economics, medicine, and technology.

Methodology

DEMOCRITUS operates through a six-module pipeline. It uses a high-quality LLM to initiate the process by proposing topics and generating causal questions within a specified domain. Subsequently, it extracts plausible causal statements from diverse textual sources via targeted LLM queries. The core technical challenge is then addressed by novel categorical machine learning methods, which convert these initially fragmented, potentially ambiguous, and conflicting textual claims into structured relational causal triples. These triples are then embedded and woven into a coherent Large Causal Model, distinct from traditional experimental numerical data-driven causal inference.

Key Findings

The primary finding is the successful implementation and application of the DEMOCRITUS system to build Large Causal Models across a broad spectrum of domains, including medicine, demonstrating its capability to extract, integrate, and organize complex causal relationships from unstructured textual data generated by LLMs into a structured format. The paper also identifies computational cost bottlenecks in scaling the system.

Clinical Impact

This technology could significantly accelerate the discovery of complex causal links in medical science, aiding in drug repurposing by revealing subtle interactions, informing the development of more accurate diagnostic algorithms by mapping disease pathways, and refining treatment strategies by providing a holistic view of interventions and outcomes. It could support personalized medicine by synthesizing diverse patient and research data into individualized causal models, and enhance public health initiatives by identifying interconnected risk factors and intervention effects.

Limitations

The paper notes limitations inherent to the current DEMOCRITUS system, which are not explicitly detailed in the abstract but implicitly include challenges related to handling ambiguity, conflicts, and the inherent 'black box' nature of LLMs, as well as the computational cost and scalability issues for very large models.

Future Directions

Future work aims at extending the capabilities of the DEMOCRITUS system. While specific directions are not detailed in the abstract, they would likely involve improving the robustness of causal statement extraction, enhancing the categorical machine learning methods for conflict resolution and ambiguity handling, optimizing computational efficiency for larger scale models, and potentially integrating with traditional numerical data sources to validate or augment LLM-derived causal claims.

Medical Domains

Pharmacology Epidemiology Pathophysiology Diagnostics Public Health Personalized Medicine

Keywords

Large Language Models Causal Models DEMOCRITUS Causal Inference Knowledge Extraction Categorical Machine Learning Health Informatics Biomedical Ontologies

Abstract

We introduce a new paradigm for building large causal models (LCMs) that exploits the enormous potential latent in today's large language models (LLMs). We describe our ongoing experiments with an implemented system called DEMOCRITUS (Decentralized Extraction of Manifold Ontologies of Causal Relations Integrating Topos Universal Slices) aimed at building, organizing, and visualizing LCMs that span disparate domains extracted from carefully targeted textual queries to LLMs. DEMOCRITUS is methodologically distinct from traditional narrow domain and hypothesis centered causal inference that builds causal models from experiments that produce numerical data. A high-quality LLM is used to propose topics, generate causal questions, and extract plausible causal statements from a diverse range of domains. The technical challenge is then to take these isolated, fragmented, potentially ambiguous and possibly conflicting causal claims, and weave them into a coherent whole, converting them into relational causal triples and embedding them into a LCM. Addressing this technical challenge required inventing new categorical machine learning methods, which we can only briefly summarize in this paper, as it is focused more on the systems side of building DEMOCRITUS. We describe the implementation pipeline for DEMOCRITUS comprising of six modules, examine its computational cost profile to determine where the current bottlenecks in scaling the system to larger models. We describe the results of using DEMOCRITUS over a wide range of domains, spanning archaeology, biology, climate change, economics, medicine and technology. We discuss the limitations of the current DEMOCRITUS system, and outline directions for extending its capabilities.

Comments

29 pages