Towards Reliable Test-Time Adaptation: Style Invariance as a Correctness Likelihood

arXiv ID: 2512.07390v1

Published: 2025-12-08

Authors: Gilhyun Nam, Taewon Kim, Joonhyun Jeong, Eunho Yang

Categories: cs.LG, cs.CV

Relevance Score: 0.90 / 1.00

View on arXiv Download PDF

Summary

This paper introduces Style Invariance as a Correctness Likelihood (SICL), a novel framework designed to address the critical issue of poorly calibrated predictive uncertainty in Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) models, particularly relevant for high-stakes domains like healthcare. SICL estimates instance-wise correctness likelihood by measuring prediction consistency across style-altered variants, acting as a plug-and-play, backpropagation-free module compatible with any TTA method. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that SICL significantly reduces calibration error by an average of 13 percentage points compared to conventional calibration approaches.

Medical Relevance

Poorly calibrated predictive uncertainty in AI models poses a significant safety risk in healthcare, where misdiagnoses or incorrect treatment recommendations can have severe consequences; SICL directly addresses this by enabling more reliable uncertainty quantification for models adapting to dynamic patient data, thereby enhancing trust and safety in AI-assisted clinical decision-making.

AI Health Application

This research directly contributes to making AI models more reliable and safer for deployment in healthcare. By providing more accurate and robust uncertainty estimates for AI predictions, it enhances trust and reduces risks in applications such as disease diagnosis, personalized treatment recommendations, predicting patient outcomes, and real-time patient monitoring, where understanding the model's confidence is crucial for clinical decision-making.

Key Points

**Problem Addressed:** Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) models frequently exhibit poorly calibrated predictive uncertainty, which is a major concern for reliable deployment in high-stakes fields such as autonomous driving, finance, and healthcare.
**Proposed Solution:** The paper introduces Style Invariance as a Correctness Likelihood (SICL), a novel framework leveraging the principle of style-invariance for robust uncertainty estimation.
**Methodology:** SICL estimates instance-wise correctness likelihood by measuring the consistency of a model's predictions when presented with different style-altered variants of the same input instance.
**Technical Advantages:** SICL is designed as a plug-and-play, backpropagation-free calibration module that only requires the model's forward pass, making it highly compatible with any existing TTA method without needing model retraining or fine-tuning.
**Comprehensive Evaluation:** The framework's effectiveness was rigorously validated across four baselines, five TTA methods, two realistic adaptation scenarios, and three distinct model architectures.
**Key Quantitative Result:** SICL demonstrably reduces calibration error by an average of 13 percentage points compared to conventional calibration approaches, significantly improving the reliability of uncertainty quantification.
**Implication for Real-world Systems:** By providing more reliable uncertainty estimates under dynamic test conditions, SICL enhances the trustworthiness and safety of AI models in critical applications where data distributions may shift.

Methodology

SICL operates by estimating instance-wise correctness likelihood. It achieves this by generating multiple style-altered variants of an input instance and then measuring the consistency of the model's predictions across these variants. This process leverages only the model's forward pass, allowing SICL to function as a plug-and-play, backpropagation-free calibration module compatible with any TTA method without requiring modifications to the original model or its training pipeline.

Key Findings

The primary finding is that SICL significantly improves the calibration of predictive uncertainty in TTA models, reducing calibration error by an average of 13 percentage points compared to conventional calibration methods. This performance improvement was consistently observed across a wide range of baselines, TTA methods, realistic scenarios, and model architectures, demonstrating its robustness and broad applicability.

Clinical Impact

The ability to obtain robust and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates from AI models adapting to real-world, dynamic medical data is critical for safe and effective clinical integration. SICL's improvements can lead to safer AI deployments by allowing clinicians to better discern when an AI's prediction is truly confident versus when it is uncertain and requires human review. This can reduce the risk of AI-induced errors, enhance diagnostic accuracy, optimize treatment planning, and accelerate the adoption of trustworthy AI solutions in diverse clinical settings, especially where patient data characteristics may evolve over time.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state any limitations or caveats of the proposed SICL framework.

Future Directions

The abstract does not explicitly suggest future research directions.

Medical Domains

Diagnostic imaging (e.g., radiology, pathology) Clinical decision support systems Personalized medicine Medical robotics and autonomous systems Remote patient monitoring Disease prognosis and risk assessment

Keywords

Test-time adaptation predictive uncertainty model calibration style invariance deep learning healthcare AI model reliability machine learning

Abstract

Test-time adaptation (TTA) enables efficient adaptation of deployed models, yet it often leads to poorly calibrated predictive uncertainty - a critical issue in high-stakes domains such as autonomous driving, finance, and healthcare. Existing calibration methods typically assume fixed models or static distributions, resulting in degraded performance under real-world, dynamic test conditions. To address these challenges, we introduce Style Invariance as a Correctness Likelihood (SICL), a framework that leverages style-invariance for robust uncertainty estimation. SICL estimates instance-wise correctness likelihood by measuring prediction consistency across style-altered variants, requiring only the model's forward pass. This makes it a plug-and-play, backpropagation-free calibration module compatible with any TTA method. Comprehensive evaluations across four baselines, five TTA methods, and two realistic scenarios with three model architecture demonstrate that SICL reduces calibration error by an average of 13 percentage points compared to conventional calibration approaches.

Comments

Accepted to WACV 2026