Diagnosing Visual Reasoning: Challenges, Insights, and a Path Forward

arXiv ID: 2510.20696v1
Published: 2025-10-23
Authors: Jing Bi, Guangyu Sun, Ali Vosoughi, Chen Chen, Chenliang Xu
Categories: cs.CV
Relevance Score: 0.80 / 1.00
View on arXiv Download PDF

Summary

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) struggle with visual hallucinations and an over-reliance on textual priors when performing complex visual reasoning tasks. This paper addresses these issues by systematically diagnosing existing MLLMs and proposing an agent-based architecture that combines LLM reasoning with lightweight visual modules for iterative refinement. The new system achieves significant performance gains on benchmarks, matching or surpassing much larger models, highlighting the need for integrating specialized visual tools.

Medical Relevance

This research is highly relevant to medicine as it directly tackles the critical challenges of visual hallucination and textual bias in AI models, which are paramount for accurate interpretation of medical images. Improving visual reasoning capabilities and ensuring reliability in MLLMs can significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient safety in healthcare applications.

AI Health Application

Improving the reliability, accuracy, and safety of multimodal AI systems used for analyzing and interpreting medical images (e.g., X-rays, MRIs, CT scans, pathology slides, retinal scans). By enhancing visual reasoning, reducing 'hallucinations,' and enabling more fine-grained analysis, this research helps lay the groundwork for AI tools that can more accurately assist clinicians in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning, thereby reducing the risk of errors stemming from AI misinterpretation of visual medical data.

Key Points

  • Current MLLMs utilizing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting exhibit visual hallucinations and an over-reliance on textual priors during complex visual reasoning.
  • A systematic, three-stage evaluation framework was employed to diagnose state-of-the-art vision-language models, uncovering critical failure modes.
  • An agent-based architecture is proposed, which integrates LLM reasoning with specialized lightweight visual modules for fine-grained analysis and iterative refinement of reasoning chains.
  • The proposed system demonstrates significant performance improvements, achieving gains of +10.3 on the MMMU benchmark and +6.0 on MathVista compared to a 7B baseline model.
  • The performance of the new architecture matches or surpasses that of much larger, state-of-the-art MLLM models.
  • The research suggests that future visual reasoning models should prioritize the integration of a broader array of specialized tools for robust analysis of visual content.
  • The authors plan to release their framework and evaluation suite to foster and accelerate future research in this domain.

Methodology

A three-stage evaluation framework was used for a systematic diagnosis of state-of-the-art vision-language models to identify key failure modes. To address these, an agent-based architecture was proposed, which combines large language model (LLM) reasoning with lightweight, specialized visual modules. This architecture enables fine-grained visual analysis and iterative refinement of reasoning chains.

Key Findings

Key failure modes in existing vision-language models, including visual hallucinations and over-reliance on textual priors, were identified. The proposed agent-based architecture achieved significant performance gains (+10.3 on MMMU, +6.0 on MathVista) over a 7B baseline, matching or surpassing much larger models. This success highlights the importance of integrating a broader set of specialized tools for robust visual content analysis in future models.

Clinical Impact

By significantly reducing visual hallucinations and mitigating textual bias, this work can lead to more reliable and trustworthy AI systems for medical image analysis and diagnostics. This improved accuracy could translate to fewer misdiagnoses, earlier detection of diseases, better treatment planning, and ultimately, enhanced patient outcomes. The iterative refinement capability could also foster more transparent and auditable AI-assisted clinical decision-making.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state limitations of the *proposed* system or study design. However, it addresses the inherent limitations of *current MLLMs*, specifically their tendency for 'visual hallucinations and an over-reliance on textual priors,' which the proposed architecture aims to overcome.

Future Directions

Future visual reasoning models should focus on integrating a broader and more diverse set of specialized tools tailored for analyzing specific types of visual content, rather than relying solely on general-purpose MLLMs.

Medical Domains

Radiology Pathology Dermatology Ophthalmology Diagnostic Imaging Oncology (for image interpretation) Medical Robotics (for visual perception)

Keywords

multimodal large language models visual reasoning visual hallucinations agent-based architecture medical imaging diagnostic AI chain-of-thought AI reliability

Abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that integrate visual and textual reasoning leverage chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to tackle complex visual tasks, yet continue to exhibit visual hallucinations and an over-reliance on textual priors. We present a systematic diagnosis of state-of-the-art vision-language models using a three-stage evaluation framework, uncovering key failure modes. To address these, we propose an agent-based architecture that combines LLM reasoning with lightweight visual modules, enabling fine-grained analysis and iterative refinement of reasoning chains. Our results highlight future visual reasoning models should focus on integrating a broader set of specialized tools for analyzing visual content. Our system achieves significant gains (+10.3 on MMMU, +6.0 on MathVista over a 7B baseline), matching or surpassing much larger models. We will release our framework and evaluation suite to facilitate future research.

Comments

5 pages